The Shroud of Turin has been a tourist attraction since the 13th century when a few towns claimed to have it.
Eventually one landed at the Vatican, which was relic and indulgence central until Luther nailed his puritanical papers to the door.
In any case, this cloth, which is not like anything from the 1st century but fairly common a pattern and material in the 13th has been the object of a lot of attention in a grey area of being presented as proof but not actually claimed as such.
In any event, you don’t need a lot of science to debunk it. Just look at the silly thing.
A really excellent explanation about the body proportions being of a deformed person at best and as I noted, apparently with no depth to them at all – is here:
http://www.gaydeceiver.com/religion/turin/
as for how it was made
an acid and then toasted
like kids using lemon juice to write secret messages and using a candle to brown and reveal the text
http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/europe/10/07/italy.turin.shroud/
I think the most annoying thing is the fallacy of appealing to the ancients.
like people centuries ago were not as brutal, cruel and out for themselves as we continue to be today
and clinging to ancient beliefs like religion, keeps us that way
money for nothing and your altar boys for free
Pingback: TV Review: Ancient X-Files | dyke writer
Pingback: Lost and Found: The Ark of the Covenant | dyke writer
Pingback: Religion’s Problem of Proof | Nina's Soap Bubble Box
Pingback: The Grail Code of Da Vinci | Nina's Soap Bubble Box
Pingback: The Rubber hits the Gritty Road: Roadkill Jesus | Nina's Soap Bubble Box