consider the blog headline vs the LGBTQ Nation News one:
America’s first gay president is no longer the worst one according to historians
He’s the best at being worst,
fastest to last place; while still in office
Actually, there’s some interesting evidence about Franklin Pierce (#14, right before Buchanan), and particularly about his relationship with his, er, “great and good friend” Nathaniel Hawthorne, who among other things wrote Pierce’s campaign biography. And thee’s been some really fascinating speculation about no less than George Washington and his long series of what a politely called his “surrogate sons.” He had any number of close attachments to young, handsome military officers, some of whom were known to be gay, most prominently John Laurens, who was also a close intimate of Alexander Hamilton (a fact unmentioned in the hit musical).
I have a feeling that there are more than one person writing one or getting a group together to continue the Hamilton wave
Theatre, after all, is very much traditionally an LGBTQ space, and historically, women did not play women.
For the Trump lovers who seem to not understand why he is the worst ‘President’ here are a few words which might stir your memory –
‘S.itholes’ DACA Healthcare Russia Transgender Troops Moore Lies White Supremacists LGBTQ civil rights attacks Threats to media and judiciary Paris Accords
Those, and many other things, are why he is the worst. Just today he is named by Amnesty as a purveyor of hate and one of the three top dangers to human rights along with Putin and Duterte.
plus that whole having to go back to the 1950s to find a good republican, basically the democrats now really.
and all the Republicans bring is the bad 1950s, except McCarthy would be unreleased about this in bed with Russians business. too bad he couldn’t spin in his grave, it’d be perpetual energy.
I thought it wasn’t appropriate to assign labels to people?
objective measurements aren’t labels
how is anything about Buchannan’s sexuality objective? It’s merely speculation.
You are asking how experts who study matters arrive at conclusions.
(notice mine is a statement)
Why do you think Buchanan’s sexuality was arrived at objectively? If that is in fact what you are stating.
because most of that era Jamestown was queer
George Washington married a woman who already had kids, so the father of your nation fathered none. Many of the his pals, his officers had sodomy charges against them, so it’s was a one for all unit kinda thing.
what was done in public vs what was not talked about in private is why queer love was called
The Love That Has No Name – speaking of which, you want a list of lesbian and bisexual First Ladies?
the Log Cabin group is named for Abraham Lincoln for a reason.
so why not ask them about past presidents?
Nina's Soap Bubble Box 