Atheism: The Gender Divide

this Max posted in an atheist group, then posted on my profile and has been mansplaining that men are smarter than women and that he is smarter than other males, eh.

Originally shared by Max GronAtheists have no proof, but they understand the truth since proof isn’t truth necessarily but belief without proof otherwise is invalid, the tools necessary for atheism: a lot of thinking to convert oneself to atheism, and reasons to not believe in any one god, that’s it really, atheism is thinking, it’s a philosophy of itself, it’s so. If “experience” of evil theism doesn’t convince you then do the thinking for hours on end, not sure of the proof, and you’ll become an atheist, that’s how atheism works! Furthermore atheism can solve problems, it can even be used for calmness of mind without a god, e.g. content that it’s not God or gods interfering with your life, like when you go in the backyard to relax and work on your literature you can thank the no-God that God isn’t out to get you!

Nina From Canada, eh
+Max Gron atheism is the rejection of religion. claiming it is one, makes you not a credible commentor. you do not get to make up your own meaning, especially for a demographic you do not belong to. that is your wrongful belief and nothing to do with reality. religion is mental illness and it is decades beyond where it should have been in the diagnostic manual

you need to do less thinking, atheism is a moment, then, you have a life of your own. 

Max Gron
+MrSitemaster2 Yes atheism is really that simple, that’s not proof that the atheism I follow is simple, it’s not, I’ll explain: if anyone says there’s a God I will say that God isn’t transcendence, unity or a personal character, or that you need to check the history that it’s not importantly pragmatic and it’s even unnecessary to believe in a God, simple my arse!

+Alex Childress To have evidence of yourself that there’s no God you need to do a lot of thinking: it requires you to ask how you know and why there’s no God since naturally God-believing is what people do, it’s much harder if you sit and convince yourself there’s no God, simple as it is it was made for thinking, that’s why atheism is a philosophy, it’s not an ideology: a set of thinking, don’t think, they do all the thinking for you, it’s a philosophy: think, think, think, and I need to think more like you should, because thinkers are smarter than the non-thinkers, and relative and pragmatic atheism do more thinking than positive and gnostic atheism, I had to think in the toilet to conclude that I knew there are no gods, there’s not much understanding going on to know this, and I still have to think about it, only in a different way.
Alex Childress
+Max Gron You lost me at “evidence of yourself that there’s no God.” Nobody has evidence that there’s no god, just as nobody has evidence that there is any god. I’m not making a positive assertion that there’s no god. I just don’t have belief in any god.

Nina From Canada, eh
+Max Gron the atheism you follow? there is rejection of religion. sum total of atheism. anything else you are making up.

Max GronI like to add atheism failed to be a non-religion, atheism is just the rejection of the belief in gods, it’s not necessarily antireligious, if I’m not a credible commentor then I’m not a free thinker but a philosopher, both the rational and irrational are true, but I follow more on the lines of rational/logical thinking, like that my brain may be in a jar, we will never know, since everyone but me is a zombie I rest my case when I say they have no consciousness and feel no pain, I did no harm, and furthermore that’s logic, furthermore your ridiculous blog doesn’t make you smarter than me, but I’m not going to jump to conclusions, I only know real truth and most people can’t take it so I went on the pessimist community and wrote what I needed to write about the crap of the universe, furthermore if more people cared what I believed in we will constructively form opinions like “I agree with you because there’s no gods” and leave it at that, we don’t need you because the You tends to not grasp subjective truth.

Nina From Canada, eh+Max Gron you’d still be wrong and just word wanking. “I only know real truth ” lol and eye roll..

Max Gron+Nina From Canada, eh Fuck you, you don’t think like me, I’ll leave every community that doesn’t think like me, be common you differing bastard! Fuck you!

Nina From Canada, eh+Max Gron unfuck you penis person who can’t cope that others exist and do not need your views.

Max Gron+Nina From Canada, eh Now that takes the cake!

Nina From Canada, eh+Max Gron boobs are bigger than balls, grow up whining baby.
and you claimed to be smart, eh

Max Gron+Nina From Canada, eh I know I’m smart.

Nina From Canada, eh+Max Gron well, you would think so, you know all you know and you have no idea how little that is and how smarter people than you can tell by the few words you post, all about you and no actual content.
but that is a deeper concept and too many words for you to grok.

Max Gron+Nina From Canada, eh I want to create a good first impression, therefore I’ll leave every single community until there’s the impression that I’m smart!

Nina From Canada, eh+Max Gron you are a complete stereotype.



This entry was posted in Zeitgeist Analytics. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Atheism: The Gender Divide

  1. dykewriter says:

    in the discussion about how men and woman communicate

    the one aspect rarely discussed

    it how terrible men are to other men, eh


  2. dykewriter says:

    Simply Curious
    Are you supposed to be the good person in this situation? Because you certainly don’t look like the good person in this situation…

    0) The flow chart… ugh.

    The questions you ask are the most clearly forced, biased, and narrow minded statements to ask in a flow chart, like when you say “Is that bc you weren’t listening or too busy manterrupting to find out” and when a person says “I don’t know”, ask ‘Is iT bEcAusE yoU aRe trYinG to esCapE AcCountAbiLitY’ for some unknown action? Like woah, talk about a quick turn.

    And of course, if anyone disagrees “There is no such thing as male privilege”, they deserve to be out right ignored. Of course, I am not saying I agree there isn’t male privilege, I am saying it comes across very bitchy.

    1) Insist that ‘religion is mental illness’, which it isn’t. Implying that all those that religious are mentally ill, which they most certainly aren’t. This is the type of thing that makes atheists seem like bigots and making religious people distrusting of atheists.

    2) Replace a topic that had no mention of man or women or gender or discrimation and make your ‘mansplainer bingo’. Let us look at this: Apparently it is bad to say “You’re just wrong”, even if they were, and can’t try to elaborate(literally what a quarter this bingo card is about). So what is the other option? Oh, say “Oh sorry, you are right about everything being said because you are a women!”

    And no, this doesn’t fit in with the bottom right corner as ‘extreme exaggeration’. This is a direct consequence of the only possible option based off of what you have implied is bad. But I guess that is just “”””logic””””” driven so it is a bit hard to make a point when you deny every point that can be thrown against you, eh?

    3) Despite the fact that Max Gron’s issue is clearly very different then anything gender related(rather, he seems to be simply arrogant), try to convert it into a gendered issue by stating “unfuck you penis person” and “boobs are bigger than balls, grow up whining baby. and you claimed to be smart, eh”.

    It is very evidently clear that you are obsessed to such a degree of the whole gendered issues that you take topics COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT to it, and try to shoehorn it in, with implications not of equality but that women are better then men, as was explained above.

    Nina From Canada, eh
    +Simply Curious you are a stereotype too and lack insight and self reflection


  3. dykewriter says:


    Nina From Canada, eh
    +Joshua Schmidlkofer +Simply Curious penis opinions and projections, men are poor communicators and only zero sum circle jerk each other, eh. your penis is your only credential, eh.

    Simply Curious
    +Nina From Canada, eh
    So being a man is automatically bad, because ‘penis opinions and projections’? If you didn’t think such, you wouldn’t act such. The reason I say something like ‘And women are always so intellectual and clear in their ways of speaking?’ isn’t me saying you are saying this. It is me giving a point highlighting how it is stupid to fixate on it being ‘men on men speaking’, and instead human on human. You know, individuals with their own ideas, thoughts, opinions, and actions that hopefully doesn’t boil down to whether they have a vagina or penis, as you are instead fixated on.

    And is that better, that train of thought that man are automatically bad, then a person thinking women are automatically bad?

    Also, I ‘don’t only zero sum circle jerk each other’. I argue with men as well, as you might have seen before. I also agree with women, hell even agreed with you. But I also disagree with you here, and that many others do, counts as ‘circle jerk’? It would be ‘circle jerking’ if I were to be talking with my ‘fellow men’ and talking about how good we are: I haven’t done that.

    Simply Curious
    +Nina From Canada, eh
    So do you have an actual point to make, supported by any logic or evidence, with constructive analytical comments, or more unsubstantiated claims about how ‘men are bad”?

    (you claimed in your blog that “Max posted in an atheist group, then posted on my profile and has been mansplaining that men are smarter than women and that he is smarter than other males, eh.”, when nothing of the sort is presented in the blog, he didn’t even MENTION the phrase ‘men’, ‘male’, ‘boy’, or ‘man’.

    It has been ENTIRELY YOU making up stuff and turning a non gendered issue and try twisting it around as somehow an attempt at male domination.

    Joshua Schmidlkofer
    +Nina From Canada, eh you just reduced yourself to a series of holes. Excellent work.

    Nina From Canada, eh
    +Simply Curious +Joshua Schmidlkofer pedantic wankers who poorly represent their gender, eh.


  4. dykewriter says:

    There is no question that religion sucks for women in a bad way

    but the reality is, that it is not merely religion that causes men to treat women as lesser than.

    and the single word of proof for my statement, not a claim, eh


    and the immediate defensive conduct and accusing women of being as bad falls into silence and is disproved by the criminal statics across the western world where women are told to be glad they got their rights and to not comment on the other nations were women don’t.


  5. Pingback: Bananas and Coconuts, eh | Nina's Soap Bubble Box

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.